jessica thomas
Member
I’ve always taken good care of my credit my scores across all bureaus range between 800–820, I maintain around 2% utilization, and I’ve never missed a payment.
But recently, I ran into a frustrating situation. I used my Citi card to make a purchase and ended up getting scammed the item never arrived. When I filed a dispute, I submitted solid evidence: tracking info showing the package went on a weird cross-country loop and ended up at a P.O. Box (not mine), screenshots of the seller blocking me, and even a statement from the postmaster saying the package had two different labels on it and wasn’t deliverable.
Despite all that, Citi sided with the seller and closed the case. I called back, and they reopened it turns out the rep who originally filed the dispute marked the wrong reason code ("cancelled goods") instead of “item not received,” so Citi was waiting on a return tracking number that didn’t exist.
I was told it would be re-investigated and to wait about 10 days. But today, I got an alert from Credit Karma saying Citi added a note to my credit report
This showed up on Equifax, though when I called them, they said they didn’t see it yet. But I also checked Experian, and the same comment is there. I didn’t file any disputes directly with the credit bureaus — Citi told me they did it on my behalf. So now I’m confused. Should I just wait and let Citi go through their process, or should I also file disputes directly with the bureaus? I’m worried that doing both could create issues, or worse, backfire.
To make matters worse, I’m in the middle of house hunting, and this kind of remark on my credit file is freaking me out. I’ve heard that even something as small as a dispute comment can cause problems with mortgage applications.
So far, my score only dropped by 1 point, likely because the temporary credit Citi gave me was reversed and the $250 charge is back on the account. Has anyone dealt with this kind of situation before? Is it better to wait out Citi’s investigation, or should I act now with the bureaus?
And how much weight does that “consumer disagrees” comment actually carry when it comes to lenders?
Any guidance would really help.
But recently, I ran into a frustrating situation. I used my Citi card to make a purchase and ended up getting scammed the item never arrived. When I filed a dispute, I submitted solid evidence: tracking info showing the package went on a weird cross-country loop and ended up at a P.O. Box (not mine), screenshots of the seller blocking me, and even a statement from the postmaster saying the package had two different labels on it and wasn’t deliverable.
Despite all that, Citi sided with the seller and closed the case. I called back, and they reopened it turns out the rep who originally filed the dispute marked the wrong reason code ("cancelled goods") instead of “item not received,” so Citi was waiting on a return tracking number that didn’t exist.
I was told it would be re-investigated and to wait about 10 days. But today, I got an alert from Credit Karma saying Citi added a note to my credit report
This showed up on Equifax, though when I called them, they said they didn’t see it yet. But I also checked Experian, and the same comment is there. I didn’t file any disputes directly with the credit bureaus — Citi told me they did it on my behalf. So now I’m confused. Should I just wait and let Citi go through their process, or should I also file disputes directly with the bureaus? I’m worried that doing both could create issues, or worse, backfire.
To make matters worse, I’m in the middle of house hunting, and this kind of remark on my credit file is freaking me out. I’ve heard that even something as small as a dispute comment can cause problems with mortgage applications.
So far, my score only dropped by 1 point, likely because the temporary credit Citi gave me was reversed and the $250 charge is back on the account. Has anyone dealt with this kind of situation before? Is it better to wait out Citi’s investigation, or should I act now with the bureaus?
And how much weight does that “consumer disagrees” comment actually carry when it comes to lenders?
Any guidance would really help.