Voluntary vs Involuntary Repossession

A

Amanda wilson

Member
My younger brother (21) made a pretty reckless decision last year he financed a motorbike in the summer of 2023 without talking to any of us. No steady job, no real plan, just vibes and a sky-high 17.99% APR over six years . Now reality’s hit hard, and he’s asking me for help getting out of this mess.

The kicker? He wants to go back to school, but this loan is dragging him down financially and mentally. He’s finally realizing how deep he’s in, which is... progress, I guess?

We’re trying to figure out the best way to deal with the loan and bike. I came across Alberta’s “seize or sue” laws, and from what I gather, even if he hands the bike back voluntarily, the lender might still come after him for the rest of the balance. That part has me a bit lost how does that actually play out? Would a voluntary repo make things worse, or is it slightly better than just waiting for them to take it?

Anyone gone through something like this in Alberta? We’re just trying to avoid making things worse while still taking responsibility. Appreciate any insight, especially from folks who’ve dealt with vehicle repossession or high-interest loans.
 
Wow, 17.99% APR stretched out over six years? That's incredibly harsh no surprise he's starting to feel the pressure now. That's the kind of interest rate that can really bury someone.
 
Opting for a voluntary repo typically leaves a less severe mark on your credit report compared to an involuntary repossession, but unfortunately, it doesn't eliminate the remaining debt he's still responsible for paying off. He’ll still owe the balance left after the vehicle is sold which could continue haunting his finances for years.
 
I experienced this exact nightmare myself last year handed the car back voluntarily but still got slammed with a hefty deficiency balance afterward. Definitely a tough pill to swallow, yet it was still better than the stress and embarrassment of waiting around for the bank to send the repo truck.
 
Exactly the "seize or sue" clause essentially lets the lender either repossess the bike, drag you into court for the payments, or even do both. Going the voluntary repo route can definitely spare you some of the extra repossession charges but it won’t shield you completely. You’ll likely still face fees and could remain liable for any leftover balance.
 
It's pretty surprising how voluntarily handing something back doesn't actually clear your debt. you're still stuck covering whatever shortfall remains after they sell it. You're left paying for the difference, even though you've already given up the item willingly talk about adding insult to injury
 
Is there any chance of negotiating a settlement with the lender before surrendering the bike? They might be open to accepting a reduced lump sum payment instead of chasing after the entire remaining balance.

It's definitely worth asking, because sometimes lenders prefer getting partial payment upfront rather than dealing with the hassle and cost of repossession and resale
 
Your brother should get a precise number on what the deficiency balance will be and then set up a clear repayment plan. He shouldn't just surrender the bike and cross his fingers hoping everything works out
 
He definitely needs to verify whether this repossession will end up on his credit report because once it hits, it could severely damage his credit score and haunt his financial future for several years.

It's not something to take lightly even one repo can significantly impact his ability to borrow money or secure favorable interest rates later on.
 
Is it accurate that waiting for the lender to carry out an involuntary repossession can actually drive up additional fees and costs?
 
Yes, involuntary repossession typically adds extra expenses, such as repossession fees, late payment penalties, and potentially even storage costs.
 
Man, your brother is lucky to have you in his corner. We all make dumb financial decisions at 21.....at least he’s trying to fix it. That’s more than most people.
 
Alberta’s Personal Property Security Act limits lenders under conditional sale agreements to either seizing the vehicle OR suing for the full balance ...not both. Voluntary repossession doesn’t change that. But if the agreement isn’t a conditional sale, they might still be able to sue. Always review the exact contract terms.
 
I gave mine back voluntarily back in 2019. Bike was worth $4K, loan was $9K. They auctioned it for peanuts, wrote off the rest. My credit tanked for a couple years, but honestly… it was better than paying 400 bucks a month on something i didn’t even ride anymore.
 
He’s young. Credit can be rebuilt. Education will help him earn more and stay out of predatory loans next time. This is a setback, not a death sentence.
 
If the loan balance is way more than the bike’s value which it probably is, private sale won’t cover it. He’d still owe the rest. And I doubt a 21 year old has the cash to cover the difference.
 
Hey i did the same thing at 23. Bought a lifted truck I couldn’t afford. Defaulted got repo’d, credit in the toilet. Took me 5 years to dig out. Now i teach financial literacy to high schoolers because i never want them to go through what i did.
 
Maybe talk to a credit counselor? Some nonprofits in Alberta offer free consultations. Could help him see all his options clearly.
 
This sounds exactly like me last year. I ended up negotiating a settlement with the lender after i missed a few payments. It’s not always advertised but once you’re behind some lenders will accept 50-60% lump sum to settle.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top